Understanding Vulnerability Scoring Systems: CVSS and EPSS

This guide provides a comprehensive comparison between two major vulnerability scoring systems: the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) and the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS).

CVSS and EPSS

In today's rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape, effectively prioritizing vulnerability remediation has become more critical than ever. Security teams face an overwhelming number of vulnerabilities across their systems, making it crucial to have reliable methods for assessing which ones pose the greatest risk and require immediate attention.

For many years, the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) has served as the primary framework for evaluating vulnerability severity. However, the emergence of the Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS) represents a significant shift in how we approach vulnerability prioritization. While CVSS focuses on the theoretical severity of vulnerabilities, EPSS takes a data-driven approach to predict the likelihood of actual exploitation in the wild.

This guide explores both scoring systems, their methodologies, and how they complement each other in modern vulnerability management practices. Whether you're a security practitioner, manager, or stakeholder, understanding these systems is essential for making informed decisions about vulnerability prioritization and resource allocation.

Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)

CVSS is a framework for assessing the severity of computer system security vulnerabilities. It aims to provide a standardized method for rating vulnerabilities.

Key Components of CVSS

CVSS consists of three metric groups:

  1. Base Score Metrics

    • Assess the intrinsic characteristics of a vulnerability

    • Include exploitability metrics (attack vector, complexity, privileges required, user interaction)

    • Consider impact metrics (confidentiality, integrity, availability)

  2. Temporal Score Metrics

    • Reflect characteristics that change over time

    • Consider exploit code maturity, remediation level, and report confidence

  3. Environmental Score Metrics

    • Allow for context-specific adjustments

    • Account for the security requirements of your implementation

CVSS Scoring Scale

  • Scores range from 0.0 to 10.0

  • Critical: 9.0-10.0

  • High: 7.0-8.9

  • Medium: 4.0-6.9

  • Low: 0.1-3.9

  • None: 0.0

Comparison Table: CVSS vs EPSS

Aspect
CVSS
EPSS

Primary Purpose

Measures vulnerability severity

Predicts exploitation probability

Score Range

0.0 to 10.0

0 to 1 (probability)

Update Frequency

Static (unless manually updated)

Daily

Methodology

Expert-driven framework

Data-driven machine learning

Complexity

Complex (3 metric groups, multiple sub-scores)

Simple (single probability score)

Context Consideration

Through environmental metrics

Through real-world exploitation data

Industry Maturity

Well-established (20+ years)

Emerging standard

Primary Use Case

Vulnerability severity assessment

Exploitation risk prioritization

Data Source

Theoretical assessment

Real-world exploitation data

Adaptability

Manual updates needed

Automatically adapts to new threats

Last updated